This article is sponsored by 3Degrees.
The world’s Forest, Land and Agriculture (FLAG) sector is responsible for approximately 25 percent of net anthropogenic emissions globally, but it also has the potential to absorb a significant amount of existing emissions from the atmosphere. To address this gap in emissions accounting and reduction, the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) introduced new FLAG guidance that requires SBTi committed companies to account for their FLAG emissions and provide pathways for decarbonization in line with the 1.5 degrees Celsius scenario. As a climate consultancy, here is how we are advising our companies should navigate the numerous important pieces of information contained in SBTi’s new FLAG guidance.
The need for FLAG guidance
Companies have a relatively mature understanding of the requirements for energy and process-related emissions reporting. Guidance from organizations such as Greenhouse Gas Protocol and CDP is well-established, and at least basic data sources exist to quantify direct emissions from primary sources of emissions. However, emissions from the forest, land and agriculture sector have been historically calculated at country, region or global level (usually addressed as LULUCF or AFOLU sector emissions) and not included in corporate emissions inventory. GHG accounting criteria and recommendations on FLAG emissions have been historically poorly addressed and there has been no framework on target setting for these emissions. Only a few companies have been accounting for and reporting these emissions at some level.
The reason for this is lack of data and methodology, resulting in around 22 percent of global emissions from the land sector not being accounted for appropriately in corporate carbon footprint calculations. Based on SBTi assessment, mitigation measures in the FLAG sector offer a potential 30 percent reduction of global emissions by 2050 through its carbon sink capacity. In this context, both SBTi and GHG Protocol started working on accounting and target setting frameworks for these land sector emissions in order to increase the coverage of actions and bring the world closer to reaching the global emissions level to 1.5C degrees.
The SBTi FLAG project developed guidance and a tool for how to set a science-based target for land-related emissions. The GHG Protocol’s Land Sector and Removals Initiative is a complementary project developing guidance on how to account for land-related emissions and removals (both technological and natural) within a carbon inventory.
By providing tools and clarity to the FLAG sector, companies finally have the structure they need to manage the 22 percent of global emissions that result from this sector, which is critical to global emissions reduction.
Criteria to set a FLAG science-based target
The SBTi FLAG guidance will ultimately affect all companies setting a science-based target. SBTi requires all companies that have, or plan to have, an SBT to calculate/estimate their FLAG emissions in their direct operations and supply chain in line with GHG Protocol’s Land Sector and Removals Guidance. Depending on the final share of FLAG emissions in their total scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, companies will have various target-setting requirements and/or expectations for FLAG-related emissions.
SBTi requires companies that meet one of the following two criteria to set a FLAG science-based target:
For companies with FLAG-related emissions that fall below the 20 percent threshold, it is still recommended to set a FLAG target, although not a requirement. If the company chooses not to set a FLAG target, FLAG-related emissions still must be included in the overall target boundary and accounted for, together with energy/industry (non-FLAG) targets for a complete GHG inventory. In this case, nature-based emissions removals cannot be accounted for in calculating progress towards an emissions reduction target.
Ultimately, all companies will need to account for FLAG-related emissions when setting a science-based target. Depending on the sector and materiality of their FLAG-related emissions, companies are required to either set a separate FLAG target or include these emissions in their non-FLAG target.
Impact on calculating FLAG emissions
Organizations setting FLAG targets will be introduced to the following new categories of emissions accounting: emissions from land use change (LUC); emissions from land management; and emission sinks (also called carbon removals). Base year FLAG emissions must be calculated in line with GHG Protocol’s Land Sector and Removals Guidance, set to be finalized in early 2023.
Several challenges connected to the FLAG emissions calculation will have to be addressed by SBTi-committers:
FLAG and non-FLAG targets need to be tracked and reported separately. This means that FLAG-related removals (biogenic removals) cannot be used to compensate for non-FLAG emissions. SBTi developed two pathways for FLAG target setting.
Carbon removals within the FLAG pathways
FLAG pathways are the only means by which companies can include biogenic (nature-based) carbon removals in their target setting and reporting under SBTi. To be reported, nature-based removals must be in the company’s supply chain (on-farm/in-forest actions). Removals must be accounted for in line with GHG Protocol’s guidance, including the requirement that a company may only include biogenic removals in its inventory that have ongoing storage and monitoring. While technological removals are included in the GHGP guidance, reporting on this category of removals will be addressed in separate SBTi guidance.
While SBTi and GHG Protocol’s land sector guidance do not allow an organization to count a removal outside of its value chain towards its near-term targets (no carbon credits), the guidance documents do address accounting for the sale of carbon credits.
In the case where a carbon removal or reduction within an organization’s value chain is quantified and sold as a carbon credit, that organization — and any other organization accounting for the activity in its value chain — cannot claim such carbon removal or reduction. Removal projects can be accounted for either within a company’s supply chain and its FLAG target or as a carbon credit by the external buyer, but not both to avoid double counting.
Although companies are required to report gross emission and removals separately, the final FLAG target is a net reduction target that includes removals. This approach was adopted in order to maintain a focus on reducing cumulative emissions to the atmosphere, while separately increasing CO2 removals.
Complying with SBTI’S FLAG guidance
Although the SBTi guidance was released recently in September, companies are already feeling its impact as the SBTi-committers have set a timeline of FLAG target compliance.
In line with the compliance of SBTi’s FLAG guidance, there are eight steps that companies could take to prepare for the new SBTi requirements on FLAG emissions:
- Discovery: Get familiar with the new FLAG guidance and its implication on your emissions accounting and reporting. Determine if the new guidance is relevant to your company and if you will need to update your targets, if already set.
- Screening: Perform a screening exercise by reviewing your key operational activities connected to the land sector in order to identify and map your FLAG emissions
Read More
