Gender-focused bond issuances have grown significantly, the study finds. Yet the authors call for stronger safeguards—specifically greater transparency and more credible reporting—to ensure stated gender outcomes match reality.
A new market study finds gender-focused bond issuances have grown exponentially over the past five years—yet the authors caution that without greater transparency and more credible reporting, these instruments risk becoming little more than “vanity projects.”
RELEVANT SUSTAINABLE GOALS
Five-Year Boom: From 74 to 576 Issuances
Published by the Luxembourg Green Exchange (LGX)—the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s platform for sustainable finance—and 2X Global, the study tracks a rapid scale-up: from 74 issuances by 19 issuers mobilising $44 billion (€37 billion) as of 1 June 2020, to 576 issuances by 133 issuers mobilising over $246 billion as of 1 June 2025.
Jessica Espinoza, CEO of 2X Global, called the growth “highly significant,” saying it shows a shift from niche to mainstream investor interest. “Issuances have more than doubled in five years,” she noted, adding that markets are increasingly pairing financial returns with measurable outcomes for women’s empowerment.
What Counts as a Gender-Focused Bond
Using a methodology developed by LGX and inspired by ICMA, UN Women and IFC guidelines, the study identifies two principal structures:
- Use-of-proceeds bonds—green, social or sustainability bonds where partial or 100% of proceeds advance UN SDG 5 objectives.
- Sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs)—in which at least one target is tied to pre-defined gender equality or women’s empowerment goals.
Typical project categories include women-led businesses, female entrepreneurship, education and inclusion, access to essential services, and targets for female representation in leadership or boards.
The majority of gender-focused bonds are social or sustainability bonds (81%), with green bonds (8%) and SLBs (11%)making up the rest. Corporate issuers predominantly located in Europe and Asia are leading in gender-focused SLBs, while supranational, sovereign and agencies issuers dominate use-of-proceeds issuances.
The study also notes 104 bonds reporting 100% allocation to SDG 5–related projects, and another 105 bonds reporting 80–90% allocation.
The majority of gender-focused bonds are social or sustainability bonds (81%), with green bonds (8%) and SLBs (11%)making up the rest. Corporate issuers predominantly located in Europe and Asia are leading in gender-focused SLBs, while supranational, sovereign and agencies issuers dominate use-of-proceeds issuances.
The study also notes 104 bonds reporting 100% allocation to SDG 5–related projects, and another 105 bonds reporting 80–90% allocation.
The Transparency Gap: When Impact Isn’t Disaggregated
The report finds that impact reporting remains thin on gender specifics. At the global issuance level, only 59 bonds(about 14% of gender-focused issuances) reported impact metrics that disaggregate outcomes for women. At the project category level, just 46 bonds (about 11%) did so.
Issuers of use-of-proceeds bonds, for example, often rely on broad indicators—such as “vulnerable people” or “number of patients”—without separating results for women. Espinoza urged a shift toward sex-disaggregated, gender-specific indicators, explicit objectives and target groups, ambitious gender targets, and regular, transparent post-issuance reporting.
The Beyond mapping the market, the study sets out recommendations to propel financing for gender equality and women’s empowerment—including advancing certification of gender-focused bonds via the 2X Global Certification frameworkto strengthen transparency and investor confidence. “With this report, we hope to turn momentum into meaningful impact,” Espinoza said.
You may also be interested in :
Women’s Rights to Forests and Land Remain Weak Across The Global South, New Report Finds
