Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley latest to exit Net-Zero Banking Alliance; a shift away from climate commitments.
RELEVANT SUSTAINABLE GOALS
In a significant shake-up for global climate finance, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley have announced their departure from the United Nations-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). The exits, confirmed last week, follow similar moves by Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo, highlighting growing tensions between voluntary climate commitments and political pressures.
The NZBA, a key part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), was established to align financial institutions with the global goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. However, the recent wave of withdrawals underscores the challenges of reconciling environmental goals with industry and political realities.
Climate Goals Under Fire
The Republican Party has ramped up scrutiny of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies, with investigations targeting major banks over their climate pledges. These probes, which began in 2022, focused on whether participation in the NZBA restricted financing for fossil fuel companies, a critical issue for Republican-led states with significant oil and gas interests.
The banks’ departures come amid escalating tensions. In recent years, financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley have expressed reservations about binding climate finance targets. While NZBA revised its requirements to maintain member participation, the intensifying hostility from GOP-led states appears to have driven many banks to reevaluate their involvement.
Despite leaving NZBA, the banks assert that their commitment to climate action remains unchanged.
A Citi spokesperson emphasized that the bank would continue to work on addressing barriers to mobilizing capital for low-carbon transitions in emerging markets. Bank of America similarly pledged to collaborate with clients on decarbonization efforts while maintaining involvement in GFANZ. Morgan Stanley, too, stated that it remains committed to supporting the transition to a net-zero economy through client partnerships.
The Bigger Picture: Climate and Credibility
The banks’ departures have drawn sharp criticism from environmental advocates, who view these moves as a retreat from meaningful climate action. Vanessa Fajans-Turner, executive director of Environmental Advocates NY, called the exits a “distressing” indication of the inadequacy of voluntary commitments.
“The failure of Wall Street to honor these alliances highlights the urgent need for regulatory oversight to ensure climate progress,” she said.
Meanwhile, Ken Pucker, a sustainability expert at Tufts University, noted that financial institutions continue to prioritize short-term profits from fossil fuel producers despite rising global temperatures. “This is both unsurprising and deeply troubling,” he said.
The wave of exits has forced GFANZ to recalibrate its mission. Once an umbrella for net-zero alliances like NZBA, GFANZ is now shifting toward offering guidance that financial firms can adopt without committing to a specific alliance. This pivot reflects the growing difficulty of securing industry-wide adherence to collective climate goals amid political and economic pressures.
When NZBA launched in 2021, its members, including the banks now withdrawing, proudly showcased their involvement. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, for instance, described the bank’s role as integral to greening the private sector. However, as the political landscape has shifted, so too has the financial industry’s willingness to publicly commit to net-zero ambitions.
A Growing Divide
The withdrawals highlight a stark divide in climate finance. On one side are those advocating for stringent, science-based targets to curb emissions. On the other, financial institutions and political actors wary of the economic and political costs associated with these commitments.
As GFANZ redefines its approach, the question remains whether voluntary alliances like NZBA can survive without regulatory backing. For now, the exits of major U.S. banks suggest that the path to net-zero will require not just ambition but enforceable action—a reality that could reshape the future of global climate finance.
The stakes are high. With global warming accelerating and its impacts growing more severe, the financial industry’s role in driving decarbonization is critical. However, without binding regulations or incentives, voluntary alliances may struggle to maintain relevance.
You may also be interested in :
Business On The Edge: Building Industry Resilience To Climate Hazards
