The AIGCC assessed nine Asian markets—China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand—and found that adaptation projects struggle to attract private capital
A lack of transparency in climate adaptation planning across Asia is hindering private investment in resilience projects, according to a new report by the Asia Investor Group on Climate Change (AIGCC). The findings highlight gaps in national adaptation frameworks, weak data accessibility, and a failure to integrate investor concerns—barriers that have left climate adaptation significantly underfunded compared to mitigation efforts.
RELEVANT SUSTAINABLE GOALS
With Asia suffering an estimated $2 trillion in damages from extreme weather events over the last three decades, the urgency to bolster climate resilience has never been higher. However, without strategic policy direction and credible financing mechanisms, private investors remain hesitant to fund adaptation initiatives, the report warns.
The Missing Link Between Investors and Adaptation Efforts
Climate adaptation—adjusting economies, infrastructure, and communities to cope with climate change’s present and future effects—has largely been seen as a public-sector responsibility. By contrast, climate mitigation, which focuses on reducing carbon emissions, has received broader investment and policy attention.
The AIGCC assessed nine Asian markets—China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand—and found that adaptation projects struggle to attract private capital due to:
- Unclear investment frameworks that fail to define roles for private financiers.
- Limited financial incentives, making adaptation projects less attractive compared to mitigation-focused ventures.
- Inadequate risk data, preventing investors from accurately assessing exposure and returns.
- Fragmented adaptation plans that lack regional coordination despite climate risks cutting across national borders.
What Investors Want: Clarity, Data, and Public-Private Collaboration
The report emphasizes that investors need clearer policy frameworks and better data access to quantify risks and build viable investment cases for adaptation. Currently, existing climate risk assessments are inconsistent, lack granularity, and often fail to communicate vulnerabilities at the sector level.
Investors also require structured financing pathways, including roadmaps that outline project pipelines, investment opportunities, and co-financing mechanisms. Without these, adaptation investments remain outside their risk-return preferences.
“Climate science clearly shows that climate change is turning extreme weather events into a ‘new normal,’” said David Eckstein, senior advisor on climate finance and investments at Germanwatch. “Yet, adaptation financing remains limited because investors lack confidence in the transparency and predictability of capital flows.”
The report identifies significant gaps in climate risk data availability across Asia. Although four of the nine markets have developed physical risk data platforms, some of these tools remain restricted. For example, South Korea’s climate crisis vulnerability assessment tool and Japan’s adaptation information platform are not widely accessible.
The lack of mandatory climate risk disclosures further complicates investment decisions. While Hong Kong and Singapore have announced clear timelines for aligning with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the rest of the region lags behind.
Moreover, national adaptation plans often fail to consider interregional risks, despite climate hazards affecting multiple countries simultaneously. The report singles out Japan as the only country actively contributing to adaptation efforts beyond its borders.
The Path Forward: Incentivizing Private-Sector Engagement
Currently, only Indonesia and China have begun integrating private-sector financing into adaptation planning. Their early-stage initiatives demonstrate the potential of public-private partnerships in scaling resilience projects.
To unlock broader investment, the report urges governments to:
- Develop open-access risk data platforms to provide clear financial implications of climate hazards.
- Mandate climate risk disclosures in line with international standards, giving investors better visibility.
- Establish national advisory groups that bring together governments, multilateral banks, philanthropies, and private investors to create tailored financial products for adaptation.
- Define financing roadmaps that lay out clear mechanisms for private-sector involvement at different planning stages.
As climate-related disasters intensify, Asia’s adaptation gap threatens long-term economic stability. Without decisive action, the region risks compounding financial losses, infrastructure failures, and social disruptions.
While mitigation remains crucial, adaptation must no longer be an afterthought. Governments and financial institutions must work together to bridge the funding gap, ensuring that resilience-building becomes a viable, investable, and scalable strategy.
You may also be interested in :
Building Climate Resilience: Strategies and Success Stories From The World Bank Report
