Comment: Taiwan’s industry is responsible for more than half of its emissions but the government’s new climate policies have no specific plan to tackle them.
When Taiwan makes climate headlines, it’s usually only because of the nation’s impact on the US and China’s climate talks.
But the island is important in its own right too. It is the 22nd biggest emitter in the world and is highly at risk from storms and sea level rise.
Taiwan’s government has made two big moves on climate recently, but these might not guarantee success unless the country cleans up its biggest source of emissions: industry.
First, on December 28, it allocated US$30 billion for climate investments up to 2030.
Known as the 12 key strategies, this money will be spent on renewable energy, hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, energy efficiency, mobilising lifestyle change and making the energy transition fair to workers.
Then, on January 10, the government passed the climate change response act. This made Taiwan the 18th country to set a legally binding net zero target. It aims to reach that target by 2050.
It introduced a carbon levy, bulked-up the country’s institutional capacity to adapt to cliamte change and established governing structures and funds for a just transition.
This is all progress. But it’s still insufficient to ensure that Taiwan meets its climate pledges.
Azerbaijan weaponises conservation law in conflict with Armenia
The biggest failure is that the 12 key strategies do not have a coherent action plan to decarbonise industry – despite the sector producing more than half of the country’s emissions.
Instead of a specific strategy, measures to cut emissions in difficult industries are just scattered across plans on hydrogen, energy efficiency, carbon capture and other areas.
On top of this, the funding isn’t guided by mission-oriented principles. It should focus on speeding up the market readiness of hydrogen – but it only provides $150m for the technology.
There’s flaws in the climate change response act too. It doesn’t set up an independent advisory body on climate, like the UK and at least 21 other nations have.
Africa objects to US chairing UN climate fund, citing unpaid $2bn
It makes companies pay only part of the social cost of their emissions through the carbon levy. The proposed reforms of fossil fuel subsidies were scrapped because of the energy crisis and the finance ministry blocked broader tax reforms.
Finally, the introduction of climate litigation was blocked because of the judicial and administrative system’s lack of familiarity with the concept.
But there were wins for climate campaigners too. The criteria for carbon offsets were tightened in the carbon levy scheme and the share of reven
Never miss a story. Join us on social.